Some results of the development of the National qualifications system in the Russian Federation

Authors

  • Ekaterina S. Reikhert South Ural State University (National Research University), 79, pr. Lenina, 76, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-1432

Abstract

The qualification of an employee plays a key role in the economic development of any state. Russia uses international experience in creating a National qualification system that would address the shortage of highly qualified personnel, create a system of continuing education and improve professional skills, and, most importantly, create tools for evaluating employee qualifications. At present, after eight years after the introduction of the concept of “professional standard” in the Russian Labor code, we can talk about certain results and problems that have arisen. Using a comparative legal analysis of the legislation, the author achieved the following research results. There are gaps in the conceptual framework, namely, the absence of the concept of a national qualification system, the uncertainty of its constituent elements, the lack of a legally fixed definition of the national qualifications framework, and there are still disputes about the concept of “employee qualification” and “professional standard”. Almost methodical work is not carried out, it is fragmented and contradictory, despite the creation of a whole system of bodies and organizations that ensure the functioning of the National qualifications system. The study allowed the author to conclude that the professional community, which should play a leading role in the work of professional qualifications councils and the creation of professional standards, takes a passive position. Employers explain this by the complexity of administrative procedures and lack of resources. Previously adopted professional standards are canceled after a fairly short time, which creates instability in labor relations, forcing employers to review their local regulations. The unresolved methodological and organizational issues allow us to state that the main problem of the current state of the process of implementing professional standards is the lack of readiness of the labor market for a real transition to these standards and their use as a universal tool for assessing the level of qualification of employees in a dichotomy, when professional standards are mandatory for some subjects, and The study also concluded that an independent assessment of qualifications is not available for the entire range of types of work. A critical assessment of the possibility of passing a professional exam without the lack of basic professional education is given.

Keywords:

national qualifications system, national qualifications framework, employee qualification, professional standard

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Батрова, Ольга Ф., Блинов, Владимир И., Волошина, Ирина А., Есенина, Екатерина Ю., Лейбович, Александр Н., Сазонов, Борис А., Сергеев, Игорь С. 2008. Национальная рамка квалификаций Российской Федерации: Рекомендации. Москва: Федеральный институт развития образования:1–14.

Гриднева, Мария А., Маслюк, Орыся Д., Петров, Максим А. 2020. «Профессиональные стандарты на рынке труда: особенности и практика применения.» Социально-трудовые исследования 39 (2): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2020-39-2-85-98

Зябликов, Дмитрий В. 2017. «К вопросу о внедрении новой системы оценки квалификаций: проблемы и пути решения.» Современные научные исследования и инновации 2. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2017/02/78300 (дата обращения: 25.07.2020).

Новикова, Наталья В. 2017. «Квалификация работника: понятие, значение для трудовых отношений, независимая оценка.» Трудовое право в России и за рубежом 4: 36–39.

Папороцкая, Ольга И. 2016. «Оценка и споры о квалификации работников.» Трудовое право 10: 101–111.

Саликова, Наталья М., Кучина, Юлия А. 2017. «Актуальные проблемы внедрения профессиональных стандартов.» Российское право: образование, практика, наука 5: 79–84.

Серебренникова, Марина С., Фатеева, Наталья Б., Петрякова, Светлана В. 2017. «Актуальность и механизм внедрения профессиональных стандартов.» Аграрный вестник Урала 1: 95–98.

Штенников, Василий Н. 2011. «Приоритеты качеств работника в условиях модернизации электронной отрасли.» Компоненты и технологии 7: 54–55.

Шубина, Татьяна А. 2014. «Конвенции и Рекомендации МОТ как источник правового регулирования трудовых отношений в России.» Проблемы современной юридической науки: актуальные вопросы. Сборник научных трудов по итогам международной научно-практической конференции: Красноярск: Инновационный центр развития образования и науки: 34–36.

Bancino, Randy R., Zevalkink, Claire C. 2007. “Soft Skills: The New Curriculum for Hard-Core Technical Professionals.” Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers 82 (5): 20–22.

Banerjee, Mandira. 2018. “New foundation promotes soft skills for workers in India.” URL: https://phys.org/news/2018-03-foundation-soft-skills-workers-india.html (дата обращения: 25.07.2020).

Bayern, Macy. 2019. “10 soft skills tech pros need to land a job.” URL: https://www.techrepublic.com/article/10-soft-skills-tech-pros-need-to-land-a-job/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2020).

Bogunovic, Goran. 2019. “Technical Skills VS Soft Skills: Which Are More Important?” URL: https://domain.me/technical-skills-vs-soft-skills-finding-the-balance/ (дата обращения: 25.07.2020).

Laker, Dennis D. R., Powell, Jimmy J. L. 2011. “The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 22 (1): 111–122.

Pant, Ira I., Baroudi, Bassam B. 2008. “Project management education: The human skills imperative.” International journal of project management 26 (2): 124–128.

Rainsbury, Elizabeth E., Hodges, Dave D., Burchell, Noel N., Lay, Mark M. C. 2002. “Ranking workplace competencies: Student and graduate perceptions.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 3 (2): 8–18.


References

Bancino, Randy, Zevalkink, Claire. 2007. “Soft Skills: The New Curriculum for Hard-Core Technical Professionals.” Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers 82 (5): 20–22.

Banerjee, Mandira. 2018. “New foundation promotes soft skills for workers in India.” Available at: https://phys.org/news/2018-03-foundation-soft-skills-workers-india.html (accessed: 25.07.2020).

Batrova, Ol’ga F., Blinov, Vladimir I., Voloshina, Irina A. 2008. National qualifications framework of the Russian Federation: Recommendations. Moscow, Federal’nyi institut razvitiia obrazovaniia: 1–14. (In Russian)

Bayern, Macy. 2019. “10 soft skills tech pros need to land a job.” Available at: https://www.techrepublic.com/article/10-soft-skills-tech-pros-need-to-land-a-job/ (accessed: 25.07.2020).

Bogunovic, Goran. 2019. “Technical Skills VS Soft Skills: Which Are More Important?” Available at: https://domain.me/technical-skills-vs-soft-skills-finding-the-balance/ (accessed: 25.07.2020).

Gridneva, Mariia A., Masliuk, Orysia D., Petrov, Maksim A. 2020. “Professional standards in the labor market: features and practice of application.” Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniia 39 (2): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2020-39-2-85-98 (In Russian)

Laker, Dennis R., Powell, Jimmy L. 2011. “The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 22 (1): 111–122.

Novikova, Natalya V. 2017. “Employee qualification: notiont, meaning for labor relations, independent assessment.” Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom 4: 36–39. (In Russian)

Pant, Ira, Baroudi, Bassam. 2008. “Project management education: The human skills imperative.” International journal of project management 26 (2): 124–128.

Paporotskaia, Ol’ga I. 2016. “Evaluation and debate on the qualifications of employees.” Trudovoe pravo 10: 101–111. (In Russian)

Rainsbury, Elizabeth, Hodges, Dave, Burchell, Noel, Lay, Mark C. 2002. “Ranking workplace competencies: Student and graduate perceptions.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 3 (2): 8–18.

Salikova, Natal’ia M., Kuchina, Iuliia A. 2017. “Actual problems of implementation of the professional standards.” Rossiiskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka 5: 79–84. (In Russian)

Serebrennikova, Marina S., Fateeva, Natal’ia B., Petriakova, Svetlana V. 2017. “Actuality and the mechanism of implementation of the professional standards.” Agrarnyi vestnik Urala 1: 95–98. (In Russian)

Shtennikov, Vasilii N. 2011. “Priorities of employee qualities in the conditions of modernization of the electronic industry.” Komponenty i tekhnologii 7: 54–55. (In Russian)

Shubina, Tat’iana A. 2014. “ILO conventions and Recommendations as a source of legal regulation of labor relations in Russia.” Problemy sovremennoi iuridicheskoi nauki: aktual’nye voprosy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Krasnoiarsk, Innovatsionnyi tsentr razvitiia obrazovaniia i nauki: 34–36. (In Russian)

Ziablikov, Dmitrii V. 2017. “On the issue of implementing a new system for evaluating qualifications: problems and solutions.” Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniia i innovatsii 2. Available at: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2017/02/78300 (accessed: 25.07.2020). (In Russian)

Published

2021-02-26

How to Cite

Reikhert, E. S. (2021). Some results of the development of the National qualifications system in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Labour & Law, 11, 308–317. Retrieved from https://rjll.spbu.ru/article/view/12015

Issue

Section

Articles