Labour law without labour law: The United Kingdom’s labour market response to COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2022.105Аннотация
The United Kingdom’s response to the COVID-19 crisis with respect to labour law and protecting workers and working relationships had several idiosyncratic aspects that distinguished it from ostensibly similar attempts to protect jobs during the pandemic. The UK approach was striking, in comparative terms, due to its lack of engagement with any process of social dialogue at the national, sectoral, and enterprise levels. The structures of worker representation of this type are so weak in the UK, due in part to a particular tradition of collective bargaining, that any such involvement would possibly not even have been feasible given the short time frame without the creation of new ad hoc infrastructure. While most other advanced economies made use of relatively familiar methods of labour law, alongside macroeconomic intervention and state support, the UK’s response was largely devoid of any traditional labour law content, and did not make use of labour law categories or methods, in particular the placing of obligations on the employer. this meant that the UK’s approach reflected a form of “labour market” regulation which aimed, unusually, at solidifying rather than deregulating the labour market. While this approach comes with many significant complexities and risks, it provides a potential model for future interventions which do not rely on sometimes tired or outdated labour law categories.
Ключевые слова:
COVID-19, protection, labour law, new categories of workers, Job Retention Scheme
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
References
Davies, Paul, and Mark Freedland. 1993. Labour Legislation and Public Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davies, Paul, and Mark R. Freedland. 2007. Towards a Flexible Labour Market: Labour Legislation and Regulation since the 1990s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deakin, Simon, and Tonia Novitz. 2020. “Covid-19, Labour Law, and the Renewal of the Social State.” Industrial Law Journal 49 (4): 493–496.
Ewing, Keith D., and Lord Hendy, QC. 2020. “Covid-19 and the Failure of Labour Law: Part 1.” Industrial Law Journal 49 (4): 497–538.
Howe, Joanna. 2018. Rethinking Job Security: A Comparative Analysis of Unfair Dismissal Law in the UK, Australia and the USA. London: Routledge.
Johnes, Geraint. 2019. “The Gig Economy in the UK: A Regional Perspective.” Journal of Global Responsibility 10 (3): 197–210.
Mangan, David. 2020. “Covid-19 and Labour Law in the United Kingdom.” European Labour Law Journal 11 (3): 332–346.
Mason, Luke. 2021. “Locating Unity in the Fragmented Platform Economy: Labour Law and the Platform Economy in the United Kingdom.” Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 41 (2): 329–342.
Prassl, Jeremias. 2018. Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Su, Chi-Wei, Ke Dai, Sana Ullah and Zubaria Andlib. 2021. “COVID-19 Pandemic and Unemployment Dynamics in European Economies.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X. 2021.1912627
Supiot, Alain. 1999. Au-Delà de l’emploi : Transformations Du Travail et Devenir Du Droit Du Travail En Europe. Paris: Flammarion.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Статьи журнала «Ежегодник трудового права» находятся в открытом доступе и распространяются в соответствии с условиями Лицензионного Договора с Санкт-Петербургским государственным университетом, который бесплатно предоставляет авторам неограниченное распространение и самостоятельное архивирование.