Community, Authority, Power: Three times epistemic, but what fits the International Labour Organisation?

Авторы

  • Beryl ter Haar Warsaw University, 26/28, Krakowskie Przedmieście, Warsaw, 00-927, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2023.120

Аннотация

The International Labour Organization (ILO) is a well-known standard setting organization in the world of work. With its standards the ILO has created an epistemic community for labour law and social security law. Central to this paper though is the question whether the ILO is also an epistemic authority or even an epistemic power. To assess this, the main activities of the ILO are described in this paper. The descriptions are made against the background of the idea of discursive diffusion, which could be typified as governance technique to influence the policies or behaviour of the members of an epistemic community. In the conclusion it is argued that the ILO can definitely be qualified as an epistemic authority, and even holds some traces of epistemic power. However, most of the activities that could make up for the ILO’s epistemic power are executed in the ILO’s field offices. We know not enough about the modus operandi in those field offices, therefore further, preferably qualitative empirical research would be needed.

Ключевые слова:

ILO, epistemic community, epistemic authority, epistemic power, labour standards, discursive diffusion, universality

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Bair, Jennifer. 2017. “Contextualising compliance: hybrid governance in global value chains” New Political Economy, 22, no2: 169-185

Clerc, J.M. 1982. "Training as an Instrument of a Strategy for the Improvement of Working Conditions and Environment," International Labour Review 121, no. 4: 565-576

Ghebali, Victor-Yves. 1989. The International Labour Organization. A Case Study on the Evolution of U.N. Specialized Agencies Den Haag: Martinus Nijhof Publishers

Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination”, International Organization 46, no 1, 4

Jäger, Christoph. 2016. “Epistemic Authority, Preemptive Reasons, and Understanding.” Episteme 13, no. 2, 167–85

Kanawaty, George, and De Moura Castro, Claudio. 1990. "New Directions for Training: An Agenda for Action" International Labour Review 129, no. 6: 751-772

La Hovary, Claire. 2015. The ILO’s Supervisory Bodies’ “Soft Law Jurisprudence.” In Research Handbook on Transnational Labour Law, edited by Adelle Blackett and Anne Trebilcock, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing: 316–328.

Leary, Virginia A. 1982. International Labour Conventions and National Law: The Effectiveness of the Automatic Incorporation of Treaties in National Legal Systems The Hague: Martinus Nijhof Publishers

Maul, Daniel. 2019. The International Labour Organization: 100 years of global social policy Geneva: ILO and Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg

Maupain, Francis. 2005. “Revitalization Not Retreat: The Real Potential of the 1998 ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers’ Rights” The European Journal of International Law 16, no.3: 439–465

Maupain, Francis. 2013. “The ILO Regular Supervisory System: A Model in Crisis?” International Organizations Law Review 10: 117-165

Potter, Edward E. 2001. “Renewing international labour standards for the 21st century”, Zeitschriftfir Arbeitsrecht: 204ff

Quintana Figueiredo Pasqualeto, Olívia de, and Lopes Scodro, Catharina. 2022. “(Re)Thinking The International Labour Law: International Labour Standards, Regulatory Strategy And Universality”, Studia Z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej 29, no. 1: 1–10

Samson, K.T. 1979. “The Changing Pattern of ILO Supervision” International Labour Review 118, no. 5: 569-587

Servais, Jean-Michel and Van Goethem, Valérie. 2016. International Labour Organization (ILO) 2nd ed. Alphen a/d Rijn: Wolters Kluwer

Standing, Guy. 2010. “The International Labour Organization”, New Political Economy 15, no.2: 307-318

Swepston, Lee. 1994. “The future of ILO standards”, Monthly Labour Review 117, no. 9: 16-23

Thomann, Lars. 2012. Steps to Compliance with International Labour Standards Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

Trubek, David M. and Trubek, Louise G. 2005. “Hard and soft law in the construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination”, European Law Journal 11, no. 3:343-364

Valticos, Nicolas. 1969. “Fifty Years of Standard-Setting Activities by the International Labour Organisation” International Labour Review 100, no. 3: 201-237

Wisskirchen, Alfred. 2005. “The Standard-Setting and Monitoring Activity of the ILO: Legal Questions and Practical Experience” International Labour Review144 no. 3: 253-290

Загрузки

Опубликован

07.02.2023

Как цитировать

ter Haar, B. (2023). Community, Authority, Power: Three times epistemic, but what fits the International Labour Organisation?. Ежегодник трудового права, 13, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2023.120

Выпуск

Раздел

Международное, сравнительное и зарубежное трудовое право