Moving past the uncertain classiffcation of platform workers

Авторы

  • Emanuele Menegatti University of Bologna, 33, Via Zamboni, 40126, Bologna, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2022.112

Аннотация

Workers under gig-economy arrangements have sharply increased in number over the last few years. However, they still struggle to achieve the rights and entitlements typically accorded by national labor laws to employees. The crux of disputes involving platform workers raised around the world — over 100 in the EU alone — evolved around their classification. Obviously, the aim of the litigation of gig workers was to open the main door leading to employment and social security rights, i.e. to obtain “worker” status. The outcome of the disputes has been rather mixed, even though there has been a clear stabilization. Many lawsuits have so far been promoted across to challenge the “independent contractor” status accorded to platforms to gig-workers, with mixed success. These decisions show that the traditional employment tests do not completely understand this new model of work, so maintaining a high degree of legal uncertainty around platform workers. Some possible solutions to get past this situation are on the table, ranging from a new legislative definition of “employment” to the creation of new intermediate categories of “dependent contractors.” However, the best way to address the problem is by working out a different distribution of employment protections between “employee” and self-employed workers.

Ключевые слова:

gig-economy, platform workers, classification, independent contractor, employee, employment test, employment rights

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Aloisi, Antonio. 2016. “Commoditized Workers: Case Study Research on Labor Law Issues Arising from a Set of ‘On-Demand/Gig Economy’ Platforms.” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37 (3): 653–690.

Arthurs, Harry W. 2018. The False Promise of the Sharing Economy. Paper Presented at the 3rd LLRN Conference, Toronto, Canada, June 25–27.

Biagi, Marco, and Michele Tiraboshi. 1999. “Le proposte legislative in materia di lavoro parasubordinato: tipizzazione di un tertium genus o codificazione di uno «statuto dei lavori»?” Lavoro e Diritto 13 (4): 571–592.

Cherry, Miriam A., and Antonio Aloisi. 2017. “Dependent Contractors’ in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach.” American University Law Review 66 (3): 637–689.

Countouris, Nicola. 2007. The Changing Law of the Employment Relationship: Comparative Analyses in the European Context. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

Davidov, Guy. 2016. A purposive approach to labour law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davidov, Guy. 2017. “The Status of Uber Drivers: A Purposive Approach.” Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal 6 (1–2): 6–15.

De Stefano, Valerio. 2016. “The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labor Protection in the ‘Gig Economy’.” Condition of work and employment series, n. 71, ILO.

Finkin, Matthew W. 2016. “Beclouded Work in Historical Perspective.” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37 (3): 603–618.

Freedland, Mark, and Nicola Countouris. 2011. The Legal Construction of Personal Work Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, Seth D., and Alan B. Krueger. 2015. A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-first Century Work: The ‘Independent Worker’. Brookings Institute, Washington DC. Accessed January 28, 2022.

http://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/files/modernizing_labor_laws_for_twenty_first_century_work_krueger_harris.pdf.

Kilhoffer, Z., Willem De Groen, Karolien Lenaerts, Ine Smits, Harald Hauben, Elisa Giacumacatos, Willem Waeyaert, Jean-Philippe Lhernould, and Sophie Robin-Olivie. Study to gather evidence on the working conditions of platform workers VT/2018/032. Final Report, 13 March 2020, CEPS, EFTHEIA, and HIVA-KU Leuven.

Menegatti, Emanuele. 2018. “A Fair Wage for Workers On-Demand via App”. In Working in Digital and Smart Organizations: Legal, Economic and Organizational Perspectives on the Digitalization of Labour Relations, edited by E. Ales, Y. Curzi, T. Fabbri, O. Rymkevich, I. Senatori, G. Solinas, 67–92. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pesole, Anarosa, Cesira Urzí Brancati, Enriaue Fernández-Macías, Federico Biagi and Ignacio González Vázquez. 2018. “Platform Workers in Europe.” Publications Office of the European Union. EUR 29275 EN. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/742789.

Prassl, Jeremias, and Martin Risak. 2016. “Uber, Taskrabbit, & Co: Platforms as employers? Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork.” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37 (3): 619–651.

Stewart, Andrew, and Shae McCrystal. 2019. “Labour regulation and the great divide: does the gig economy require a new category of worker?” Australian Journal of Labour Law, 32, 4–22.

Weil, David. 2015. The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Загрузки

Опубликован

27.03.2022

Как цитировать

Menegatti, E. (2022). Moving past the uncertain classiffcation of platform workers. Ежегодник трудового права, 12, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu32.2022.112

Выпуск

Раздел

Теория трудового права